Shielding of patients, foolish or reasonable?
Keywords:shielding, pediatric, gonad shield
Radiographers worldwide are challenged to rethink the best practice of shielding in view of a recent paper by Marsh and Solisky. These authors are of the opinion that with the latest digital equipment, due to the utilising of automatic exposure control, patients will receive a higher dose with the shielding. They cite a comment made almost 30 years ago claiming that in terms of shielding, only foolish voices are heard. More reasonable voices should be heard to change the course of training programmes and regulation because there is no benefit in shielding to contribute to the health of a patient. They conclude that it is more reasonable to avoid the shielding of patients whenever possible. A 2014 publication reports on a review of gonad shielding during paediatric radiography. The 130 evaluated images revealed that gonad shielding was often omitted and incorrectly used. These results signposted that gonad shielding was not effective and efficient for female patients, especially when incorrect use of lead shielding results in repeat exposures. The authors concluded that gonad shielding should thus be abandoned for female patients.
LicenseCopyright on all published material belongs to the Society of Radiographers of South Africa (SORSA).
I hereby understand and declare that:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright are reserved to the authors, as well as the right to reproduce original figures and tables from this item in their future works, provided full credit is given to the original publication The South African Radiographer ISSN 0258 0241.
- In consideration of the reviewing and editing done by the editors of The South African Radiographer of the above named manuscript, the author/s hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership world-wide, in all languages, to the Society of Radiographers of South Africa in the event that this manuscript is accepted for publication.
- If the manuscript has been commissioned by another person or organisation, or if it has been written as part of the duties of an employee, that full authorization has been given by the representative of the commissioning organisation or employer to be published in the The South African Radiographer.