Optimum tube voltage for pelvic direct radiography: a phantom study

Authors

  • Simon J. Jacobs Curtin University
  • Lauren A. Kuhl Curtin University
  • Guanlong Xu Curtin University
  • Rachael Powell Curtin University
  • Danielle R. Paterson Curtin University
  • Curtise K.C. Ng Curtin University

Keywords:

Direct radiography, flat panel detector, dose-image optimisation

Abstract

Pelvic radiography is a frequently performed radiological examination. Its average effective dose (E) is 0.53 mSv which is comparable to the annual per caput dose from diagnostic radiology, 0.6 mSv. However, existing studies on optimum tube potential for pelvic X-rays tend to be limited to screen-film and computed radiography. The purpose of this study was to determine the tube voltage for dose-image optimisation in pelvic direct radiography (DR). Fifty-four pelvic phantom images were acquired using 50-135 kV at 5 kV increments (three images taken at each kV level) and milliampere seconds determined by automatic exposure control. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and dose were measured for each image. Figure of merit (FOM) defined as the ratio of SNR2 to E was used to determine the optimum tube potential. The FOM indicates 135 kV is the optimum setting for pelvic DR. Using the European Commission tube voltage recommendation (75-90 kV) as a reference point, there was only a slight (5.56%) decrease of image quality in the femoral neck region at 135 kV. However, its E was 0.054 mSv. This appreciable dose reduction potential could be attributed to the improvement of detective quantum efficiency and image processing technology of the recent DR system.

Author Biographies

Simon J. Jacobs, Curtin University

BSc (Hons) Graduate, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Lauren A. Kuhl, Curtin University

BSc (Hons) Graduate, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Guanlong Xu, Curtin University

BSc (Hons) Graduate, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Rachael Powell, Curtin University

BSc (Hons) Graduate, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Danielle R. Paterson, Curtin University

BSc (Hons) Graduate, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Curtise K.C. Ng, Curtin University

Senior Lecturer, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University

Downloads

Published

2015-11-23

Issue

Vol. 53 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright on all published material belongs to the Society of Radiographers of South Africa (SORSA).

I hereby understand and declare that:

  • All proprietary rights other than copyright are reserved to the authors, as well as the right to reproduce original figures and tables from this item in their future works, provided full credit is given to the original publication The South African Radiographer ISSN 0258 0241.
  • In consideration of the reviewing and editing done by the editors of The South African Radiographer of the above named manuscript, the author/s hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership world-wide, in all languages, to the Society of Radiographers of South Africa in the event that this manuscript is accepted for publication.
  • If the manuscript has been commissioned by another person or organisation, or if it has been written as part of the duties of an employee, that full authorization has been given by the representative of the commissioning organisation or employer to be published in the The South African Radiographer.